Date: 2006-08-04 01:41 am (UTC)
This has sparked some interesting discussion, and statements of positions that I generally agree with (principally, if it's done for a good reason, I'll give it a go, because thought, not blind rejection, has motivated it).

As for 'Should stories using 'old canon' still be written after new canon has come out and some time has passed?'

I wouldn't say 'should' because I don't think we have the right to try to regulate people's preferences. I will say I think the author is taking a risk, and, for me, needs to have a good reason for doing so, with a good fic as the end product. I can always stop reading if the result seems to be lame. I would hate to try to stop people from exploring what are/seem to them to be good ideas! (Some writers have better judgement than others, of course...)

I clicked on 'not HBP/OotP compliant' as a sort of neutral label, but really, what you're proposing is AU: changing a circumstance that is (now) canon. AR seems generally to be taken to mean shifting the characters to some other setting, and playing out ideas in that looser framework.

I'll be interested to see what comes of this, in terms of your own writing.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kennahijja: (Default)
kennahijja

May 2012

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 11:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios