kennahijja: (Hexe-Eff off)
[personal profile] kennahijja
(gacked from [livejournal.com profile] ella_bane)

Yup, unlike the fanfic heresy a while back, these are contentious (and not surprising, if you know me). But I still love you, all right! You don't have to agree, and are welcome to hit me with dead carps too!

1. It almost physically hurts me when fics are taken down just because the author falls out of love with them or decides to leave fandom.

2. I hate it when people try to tell others what they shouldn't write/draw because it's immoral/harmful/whatnot. But watching people self-censor their imagination is even more painful.

3. Compared to the utter wrongness of dragging RL – employers, lawyers, police, spouses – into fandom disputes, plagiarism is *nothing*. Because hell, it's supposed to be us against the mundanes – running to RL authorities is, well, treason to the Cause!

4. Once your work's out there, it's fair game for just about everything except posting under somebody else's name – especially for reccing, reviewing, downloading, sharing and writing spin-off fic for. Deal!

5. Ron haters make me msad [... except for Ron-haters with a pureblood pedigree, a riding crop and a nice line in acerbic banter]. (yeah, that's pretty much plagiarised from [livejournal.com profile] ella_bane, but she's dead right! And amended after intercession by [livejournal.com profile] fee_absinthe, who, as always, has the priorities right)

6. The 'say good things or say nothing' attitude to feedback that seems to dominate fandom annoys me to no end. But bitching about concrit makes me *really* mad.

7. 'Anymore' bugs me even more than 'cum'. Though not quite as much as 'orbs'.

8. LJ name changes... meh! Fandom name changes suck in general, unless it's for good RL reasons. It's hell on those of us with brains full of holes.

9. Taking your OTP(s) seriously is seriously silly.

10. As long as there's slash and gen, we could almost do without het, couldn't we? *ducks*


ETA: One of those is a joke - just in case it's not obvious.

Date: 2006-08-26 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijan.livejournal.com
Most definitely in agreement with most of that. Especially the fact that we could do very nicely without het. There's enough of that crap in canon, right? :D

*huggles*

Date: 2006-08-26 09:16 pm (UTC)
ext_18536: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mizbean.livejournal.com
Yes, to #1. I don't think this gets talked about much, but it disappoints me too. I know their fics belong to them, but it makes me sad, especially when I don't understand their reasons.

Date: 2006-08-26 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roz-morgan.livejournal.com
Re: 10 - Het's very nice but it's all over TV and radio and real life and it doesn't need to be in fandom.

Does anyone apart from teenage girls and Mills and Bloon Housewives read it?

Date: 2006-08-26 09:36 pm (UTC)
florahart: (Default)
From: [personal profile] florahart
2. I hate it when people try to tell others what they shouldn't write/draw because it's immoral/harmful/whatnot. But watching people self-censor their imagination is even more painful.

10. As long as there's slash and gen, we could almost do without het, couldn't we? *ducks*


I dunno, I think these two contradict each other.

For the benefit of previous commenters: I am not a teenager nor a housewife. I write slash. A lot. I also write het. I also read it. I also like it. I also like slash. And genderfoolery. And bisexuality. And various other explorations of any number of things. I in fact think the label itself is messy; the dynamics of the particular pairing in the particular fic may or may not fall in line with the stereotypical representations of het reality, or with canon. For instance, I doubt anyone has written a sweet canon-like Bellatrix/Neville. Would that be het? Absolutely. Would it be real likely to have any of the same dynamics as any canon relationships? Not so much, unless you think Bella/Rodolphus is clearly delineated in canon and has the same sense about it. Is it worth exploring anyway? Maybe. I don't write that particular pair, for what it's worth. What about Tonks/Remus? That's canon, but there are not exactly painfully few ficks in which it is genderfucky. Metamorphmagus, and the blood relationship to Sirius--that gets played with a lot.

In any case, I think it's funny to say you don't want to tell folks what to write/imagine, but then say really, we could just do without this whole category. There are whole categories I personally could largely do without (most deathfic, for instance), but I don't think "we" should do without them. Just me, applied by not clicking those particular cuts.

Date: 2006-08-26 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melusinahp.livejournal.com
Well, without het there would be no Harry/Bellatrix and I would be sad.

Date: 2006-08-26 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furiosity.livejournal.com
1. What if the author is ordered/asked to take down their fanfic by their pro publisher?

2. I do not understand how anything fictional can be immoral or harmful at the source. I also think that if someone thinks something fictional is harmful/immoral, they should avoid that type of fiction. >_<

3. Dude, yes.

4. Pretty much. Though I'd say that if someone's writing spin-off fic, it's only fair to let the author know, since concepts/storylines are likely to be borrowed.

5. I like to pretend that nobody hates Ron. Some days, I am successful!

6. D'you think something can be done about it?

7. *confused* What's wrong with "anymore"? Just that it's US spelling?

8. Meh, I'm pretty indifferent to those. Their LJ, their money.

9. Haha, yes. Especially if your OTP is a slash pairing.

10. I don't read or write het, but it's no skin off my nose if other people do.

Date: 2006-08-26 11:38 pm (UTC)
snorkackcatcher: (Default)
From: [personal profile] snorkackcatcher
Mostly agree, oddly enough. :)

#2: Depends what their imagination throws up. For some stuff, I'd be delighted if they'd keep it to themselves.

#3: Generally, I have no problem with the mundanes, even if I'm not very good at being one a lot of the time. :)

#7: But none are as annoying as the use of 'length' to mean cock, er, penis.

#10: *follows trajectory of duck to ensure dead carp hits regardless*

Well, I did say mostly agree. :D

Date: 2006-08-26 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rfachir.livejournal.com
re:10.
*Winds up with a big slimy monkfish.* It may be a weak excuse for porn (the het route in general) but it's like mocking the OTP people - it's a deep and abiding love. There's no reason to go mocking the ordinary - sometimes it can be sublime. (And sometimes it can be dreck. Just like Veela!Draco. But he needs love too!)

Date: 2006-08-27 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
Het can be just as fun, meaningful, sexy and intelligent as slash or gen and I enjoy reading them equally. It doesn't depend on the orientation (which is offensive) but more on the author and how they handle the pairing. I'd rather read a great fic about my most despised pairing than I would a shitty fic about my OTP.

Not that there isn't shitty het out there: JPC, if you've seen some of the shite submitted to R/T communities you'll know what I mean. But there's an equal amount of shitty, unsexy and lacking-entirely-in-merit slash as well.

Date: 2006-08-27 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dbassassin.livejournal.com
I'm no het fan, but I don't like watersports or bloodplay either, and I'd never consider the idea that other people shouldn't write it. Whatever floats people's boats. But I see this point is more than adequately addressed above, so I'll shut up about that now.

And regarding the last part of 4. I think writing spin-off fic featuring someone else's OCs or original magic is a big no-no. I would never consider using, as an example, rock magic a la Hall of the Mountain Kings without asking Tara Tory's permission. If someone were to write a fic featuring one of my OCs I would be right pissed off. Does that make me a hypocrite? *shrugs* Perhaps, but unlike JKR, I don't make billions from my fic.

Date: 2006-08-27 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] masterofmercury.livejournal.com
1-6: yes.
7. >_> *hide her bucket load uses of 'anymore'*
8. it confuses me more than annoy me, because I'll, most of the time, have no idea who's who. meh. And it's not likr everyone will annouce that they just changed their name from this to that.
9. *nod*
10. Hear, hear! XD

Date: 2006-08-27 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pushdragon.livejournal.com
*defriendz you instantly*

Your priorities are so out of whack, girl! How can *anything* be worse than "cum"?

I also think you mean to qualify item 5 by adding " ... except for Ron-haters with a pureblood pedigree, a riding crop and a nice line in acerbic banter."

Date: 2006-08-27 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexandramuses.livejournal.com
*cries* I'm guilty of one of those. But I'm not a Buffy fan, and people kept assuming I got my name from Fyre's fic, which really stung, since it made me feel less original.

And I'm holding onto my het! You can't make me, can't make me, nooo!!

(I don't understand people who didn't see that you were making a joke...)

Date: 2006-08-28 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bellonablack.livejournal.com
Actually, I agree :)

Het can be pretty vapid as well as highly cool and intellectual. So can slash. (and I know you were playing around too, Hijja :)) I prefer utterly weird pairings, so slash or het, I am still amused :)



Date: 2006-09-09 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
1) How about if your creativity has come to a dead end and you don't know how to keep going with it? That is why I took down "...if all the heroes lose?" and a couple of other things.

3) I thought this was real life?

4) I disagree. And I seem to remember someone telling me off because of excessively negative reviews. I hope this is a case of change of mind and not of mere inconsistency.

6) I thought that was your attitude? We had a debate about it, if you remember.

9) No sillier than being obsessed by slash and all other non-canonical sexual relationships. But of course none of us wise people would be so silly, would we now?

Profile

kennahijja: (Default)
kennahijja

May 2012

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 01:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios